Opulence in 2013? Welcome to TEFAF

Three hours after boarding a train near Amsterdam, I stepped into the medieval town of Maastricht, which perks up around this time every year since The European Fine Art Foundation, or TEFAF, began in 1988. I joined the throngs of collectors, dealers, students, and art lovers in the wings. And then the doors opened to the world’s most lavish art fair, featuring exquisite fine art, antiques, jewelry and other treasures from more than 260 dealers.

TEFAF is as well known for putting on a spectacle as it is for its rigorous vetting process. To ensure that collectors can buy with highest confidence, a committee of 175 experts in various categories painstakingly examines each work for authenticity, condition, and quality. They employ XRF technology, and TEFAF was the first fair to incorporate The Art Loss Register. Furthermore, the fair is by invitation only: a gallery must have a fine pedigree in order to participate. Official categories include paintings, antiques, modern works, manuscripts, classical antiquities, haute joaillerie, design, and paper-based works. I was surprised at the diversity I encountered within these areas: modern sculpture, Uruguayan equestrian gear, Renaissance leather wall panels, Chinese porcelain, Iznik tiles, seventeenth-century metalwork, Japanese prints, Australian aboriginal art, and contemporary ceramics.

Though the fair’s calling card is Old Master paintings, the exhibition design boasted a modern flair, with sharp edges, sweeping high walls, a color palette of black, white, and gray, and a large-scale contemporary work adorning the entrance (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Entrance hall of TEFAF 2013 featuring Joanna Vasconcelos’ piece, Mary Poppins. Photograph by Harry Heuts.

Figure 1. Entrance hall of TEFAF 2013 featuring Joanna Vasconcelos’ piece, Mary Poppins. Photograph by Harry Heuts.

With a nod to the host country, enormous vases of fresh tulips were placed in every aisle to contrast the hard edges. The avenues and squares were named for familiar Western landmarks: Sunset Boulevard, Place de la Concorde, Piazza di Spagna, and Champs-Élysées. There was no connection, however, between the themed street names and the stands lining them. In fact, each booth strove to distinguish itself from the others by means of texture, installation, mood, and architecture. One gallery had two floors at its disposal, other galleries required visitors to wend their way around precious antiques and into dim corners, as if recreating the act of exploring a cabinet of curiosities. Still others were washed in pastel-mint hues or bedecked in rich embossed velvet, and many galleries could not resist the clean white cube. Several exhibitors ingeniously displayed iPads programmed with slide shows of manuscript pages, artists’ books, and photographic albums, a clever technological option for museums.

A hidden gem at this year’s TEFAF was one such album, “Photographs from the Life,” containing 75 images by Julia Margaret Cameron at Hans P. Kraus, Jr. Fine Photographs (asking price $6.5 million). Each work in impeccable condition, preserving both sharp detail and atmospheric softness, sequenced together in a series of moving portraits that are Cameron’s hallmark, making this a piece a worthy investment.

The relatively new paper section successfully attracted foot traffic thanks to a mini-exhibition of Van Gogh drawings strategically placed for this purpose. Galleri K, also in the paper section, instantly lured people into its stand with staggeringly detailed large format photographs by Andreas Gursky, Candida Höfer, Thomas Struth, and Thomas Demand (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Image of visitor in front of large-format photographs at Galleri K. Photograph by Loraine Bodewes.

Figure 2. Image of visitor in front of large-format photographs at Galleri K. Photograph by Loraine Bodewes.

In the modern section, Sperone Westwater mesmerized onlookers with its display of dazzling pieces by Damien Hirst, Ali Banisadr, and Nabil Nahas (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Stand of Sperone Westwater gallery. In the forefront is Damien Hirst’s mandala-like composition of butterfly wings.

Figure 3. Stand of Sperone Westwater gallery. In the forefront is Damien Hirst’s mandala-like composition of butterfly wings.

One had to edge her way through the masses huddled before a wall of Goya lithographs at Frankfurt-based gallery Kunsthandlung Helmut H. Rumbler. Belgian artist Fred Eerdeken, represented by Patrick Derom Gallery, provided a quirky element to the show with his refreshingly simple concept of creating words in shadow by means of wires implanted in a wall.

The sheer variety of the show, elegance of the exhibition design, museum-quality condition and installation of the pieces, and juxtaposition of genres united to create an atmosphere pulsing with excitement. Several dealers and assistants whom I queried about this year’s TEFAF responded with enthusiasm and positivity about sales and interest from buyers. There was a slight whiff of disappointment that only a fraction of the private jets that usually fly in were present, but I was told by one dealer that the smaller attendance assured the presence of serious, committed collectors. Although some areas, such as nineteenth-century art, seemingly disappeared during the throes of the recession, the Old Masters and modern and contemporary art remained fairly impervious to it for the usual reasons: collectors turned to art as a secure investment, stable in comparison to stocks, and attractive for its accumulation of value. Judging by this year’s fair, the art market is more than thriving, with TEFAF announcing its plan for a joint venture with Sotheby’s in China, “TEFAF Beijing 2014.” Thus, despite concern about the economy, the sentiment at TEFAF was captured by a decorative pillow resting in an Old Masters’ stand: “Never economize on luxury.” A motto for next year’s TEFAF, perhaps?

Posted in All Student Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

(Nearly) Invisible Art: the Leiden University Medical Center Art Collection

The Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) is a world-renowned university and teaching hospital. What few people may realize is that it boasts an art collection and free public gallery, which hosts five shows per year. The LUMC holds an exhibition of nominees and winners of the Hermine van Bers visual arts prize—a yearly award that stimulates the development of young artists—and invites contemporary artists to create site-specific pieces in a large open hall with an abundance of natural light. The collection, primarily photographs, prints, and drawings, which began 25 years ago, continues today through the efforts of one curator, Sandrine van Noort. Interestingly, the purpose of the collection is markedly different from that of institutions devoted to art. Instead, the works provide the background for photos of newborn babies, offer a temporary escape from nail-biting stress, and splash color onto otherwise depressingly industrial cement walls. The art distracts from the hospital environment and brings a labyrinthine institution down to a more human scale.

David Lindberg, 45T Chinese Purple, mixed media, 2012.

David Lindberg, 45T Chinese Purple, mixed media, 2012.

Continue reading

Posted in All Student Posts, Alumni Updates | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Now Dig This! and the Ken Johnson Controversy: A Case For Pluralism in 20th Century Art History

Installation view of Now Dig This! Art and Black Los Angeles 1960-1980 at MoMA PS1, © MoMA PS1. Photo by Matthew Septimus.

Installation view of Now Dig This! Art and Black Los Angeles 1960-1980 at MoMA PS1. Photo by Matthew Septimus.

Ken Johnson’s controversial review of Now Dig This! Art and Black Los Angeles 1960-1980, currently on view at MoMA PS1 through March 11, has become nothing less than an art world scandal, sparking a deluge of denouncements from readers, an open-letter and petition against the New York Times backed by prominent artists, critics and art historians, and even an attempted rebuttal on the art critic’s Facebook page, with continued debate in the comments section. Some of Johnson’s most problematic assertions focus on questions of originality and “quality,” each clearly sited in the historical standards of high Modernism. “Black artists did not invent assemblage,” he protests. “In its modern form it was developed by white artists like Picasso, Kurt Schwitters, Marcel Duchamp, David Smith and Robert Rauschenberg.” Later, the critic attacks the use of socially-engaged themes during a period in which art was supposed to be purged of realism and representation: “The art of black solidarity gets less traction because the postmodern art world is, at least ostensibly, allergic to overt assertions of any kind of solidarity.”[1]

These accusations would be relevant if Johnson’s concerns were shared by the exhibition’s curator, Columbia Professor Kellie Jones, but Now Dig This! is not intended to de-throne Duchamp and Rauschenberg. Jones presents Now Dig This! as an art historical survey of the African-American cultural scene in 1960s-1980s Los Angeles; she frames the exhibition as an arrangement of episodes rather than a singular narrative. Each gallery focuses on a different theme, style, or institutional network, thus allowing the viewer multiple points of entry into a wide body of artistic and historical material. Johnson’s attachment to the master narrative of Modernism is the first (and perhaps most innocuous) interpretive error of his review, revealing the degree to which this evolutionary historical model remains deeply ingrained in our thinking. Continue reading

Posted in All Student Posts, Recommended Events | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Wade Guyton: X is to Y as

Left: Wade Guyton, Untitled, 2006. Epson UltraChrome inkjet on linen, 90 × 53 in. (228.6 × 134.6 cm). Collection of Mark Grotjahn and Jennifer Guidi. © Wade Guyton. Photograph by Lamay Photo. Image courtesy whitney.org. Right: Wade Guyton, Untitled, 2006. Epson UltraChrome inkjet on linen, 89 × 54 in. (226.1 × 137.2 cm). Private collection. © Wade Guyton. Photograph by Lamay Photo. Image courtesy whitney.org.

Left: Wade Guyton, Untitled, 2006. Epson UltraChrome inkjet on linen, 90 × 53 in. (228.6 × 134.6 cm). Collection of Mark Grotjahn and Jennifer Guidi. © Wade Guyton. Photograph by Lamay Photo. Image courtesy whitney.org.
Right: Wade Guyton, Untitled, 2006. Epson UltraChrome inkjet on linen, 89 × 54 in. (226.1 × 137.2 cm). Private collection. © Wade Guyton. Photograph by Lamay Photo. Image courtesy whitney.org.

Wade Guyton is, in many ways, an art historian’s artist. He engages with the questions that get us going: questions of aesthetics, medium specificity, and the iconography of modernism itself, not to mention the very directness with which he prompts his viewers to wonder what’s “relevant” in art today. Lots of ink has been spilled attempting to define Guyton’s artistic practice, and many have asserted his status as a painter. A painter who, despite his use (primarily) of Epson inkjet printers and tabletop scanners, tips his hand both by very consciously employing that ur-signifier of painting—canvas plus stretcher bar—and by articulating the limits of his medium. Guyton’s current retrospective at the Whitney (on view October 4, 2012 to January 13, 2013) gives us an opportunity to re-examine these interpretative strictures and consider the work through the varied art-historical lenses that it demands. Continue reading

Posted in All Student Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Melissa Chiu on ‘Generational Ruptures’ in Chinese Contemporary Art

Dr. Melissa Chiu gave a lecture titled “Art + Politics in Chinese Contemporary Art” as a part of the Daniel H. Silberberg Lecture Series on November 27th, traveling the few blocks between the IFA and her role as Museum Director and Senior Vice President of Global Arts and Cultural Programs at Asia Society. Chiu has published many books and articles within the field of Chinese contemporary art as well as the broader topic of Asian Contemporary Art. Her full lecture can be accessed via the IFA’s Vimeo page.

This year the Silberberg Lecture Series is focusing on “Violence as a matter of disciplinary concern.” Violence is a recurring theme within the history of art and its various manifestations help set the tone for the understanding of a period or a particular artist precisely because it is a thread of humanity that can be represented with such variety. Chiu’s lecture thus was an inquiry into the theme of violence in contemporary Chinese art. Continue reading

Posted in All Student Posts, Chinese Art, Green Beijing Series | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment